Skip to main content

ADR: Validated Patterns Framework for Multi-Platform Deployments

Status: PROPOSED

Date: 2025-01-16

Decision Makers: Architecture Team, DevOps Team

Context​

The existing bootstrap validation system had inconsistencies in how deployments were handled across different platforms and environments. Each deployment often required custom scripts and manual interventions, leading to:

  1. Inconsistent Deployments: Different approaches for similar platforms
  2. No Standardization: Lack of industry best practices
  3. Poor Reproducibility: Difficult to recreate deployments
  4. Limited Learning: No systematic capture of deployment knowledge
  5. Platform Silos: Separate, incompatible approaches for each platform

The project needed a comprehensive, standardized approach to handle deployments across:

  • OpenShift
  • Kubernetes
  • Docker
  • Node.js
  • Python
  • Model Context Protocol (MCP) servers
  • Agent-to-Agent (A2A) systems

Research​

Extensive research was conducted across all seven platforms to understand industry best practices:

OpenShift Validated Patterns​

Source: Red Hat Validated Patterns (https://play.validatedpatterns.io/)

Key Principles:

  • Hierarchical values override system
  • GitOps with ArgoCD
  • Helm charts for templating
  • Environment abstraction
  • Secrets management with Vault

Pattern Structure:

  • Common repository with core framework
  • Bill of materials (operators, charts, scripts)
  • Naming conventions (pattern name + cluster group name)
  • Sync waves and hooks for orchestration

Kubernetes Best Practices (2025)​

Sources: CNCF, Kubernetes Documentation, Industry Blogs

Core Deployment Strategies:

  • Rolling updates (gradual replacement)
  • Blue/green deployments (zero-downtime swaps)
  • Canary releases (progressive rollouts)
  • A/B testing deployments

Essential Practices:

  • Declarative YAML manifests
  • Resource requests and limits
  • Liveness and readiness probes
  • Network policies for security
  • GitOps workflows
  • Horizontal Pod Autoscaling

Docker Containerization Patterns​

Sources: Docker Documentation, Sysdig, Google Cloud

Security Best Practices:

  • Multi-stage builds for smaller images
  • Non-root user execution
  • Read-only filesystems
  • Distroless or scratch base images
  • Regular vulnerability scanning

Optimization Techniques:

  • Layer caching and ordering
  • .dockerignore for build context
  • Precise base image versions (avoid 'latest')
  • Minimal package installation

Node.js Microservices Patterns​

Sources: LogRocket, Apriorit, Harness

Deployment Approaches:

  • Containerization with Docker
  • Kubernetes orchestration
  • Serverless (AWS Lambda, Azure Functions)
  • PaaS (Heroku, Google App Engine)

Key Patterns:

  • Database-per-service
  • API gateways for aggregation
  • Circuit breakers for resilience
  • Centralized logging

Python Application Patterns​

Sources: Python Packaging Guide, Full Stack Python

Deployment Strategies:

  • Traditional servers (Gunicorn/uWSGI + Nginx)
  • Containerization (Docker + Kubernetes)
  • PaaS platforms (Heroku, GCP)
  • Serverless (AWS Lambda, Google Cloud Functions)

Best Practices:

  • Virtual environments for isolation
  • Requirements freezing
  • CI/CD automation
  • Security hardening (HTTPS, authentication)

MCP Server Patterns​

Sources: MCP Documentation, MCP Community Resources

Architecture Best Practices:

  • Single-purpose servers (avoid monoliths)
  • High-level tool grouping
  • Structured error handling
  • Schema validation with Pydantic

Security Considerations:

  • HTTPS for HTTP transports
  • OAuth 2.0/2.1 with PKCE
  • URI validation and access control
  • Never write to stdout for STDIO servers

Deployment:

  • Docker containerization (60% reduction in support tickets)
  • MCP Inspector for validation
  • Detailed logging (40% reduction in debugging time)

A2A Protocol Patterns​

Sources: Linux Foundation, Google Developers, A2A Project

Core Capabilities:

  • Capability discovery via Agent Cards (JSON)
  • Task-oriented communication
  • Multi-modal support (audio, video streaming)
  • State management

Technical Foundation:

  • JSON-RPC 2.0 over HTTP(S)
  • Enterprise authentication (OpenAPI schemes)
  • Real-time feedback and state updates
  • Streaming and push notifications

Industry Adoption:

  • 100+ technology companies
  • Production-ready v1.0 by late 2025
  • Complementary to MCP (A2A for agents, MCP for tools)

Decision​

We will implement a Validated Patterns Framework that:

  1. Defines Standard Patterns: Create comprehensive pattern definitions for all seven platforms based on researched best practices

  2. Auto-Detects Platforms: Build a platform detection system that automatically identifies project types using:

    • File system analysis (Dockerfile, package.json, requirements.txt, etc.)
    • Content pattern matching
    • Dependency analysis
    • Confidence scoring

  3. Applies Patterns Consistently: Implement a pattern application framework that:

    • Validates prerequisites
    • Creates required configuration files
    • Executes deployment phases in order
    • Runs validation checks
    • Sets up health monitoring

  4. Maintains Pattern Memory: Integrate with the existing memory system to:

    • Store applied patterns for reuse
    • Track deployment successes and failures
    • Evolve patterns based on real-world experience
    • Provide recommendations for similar projects

  5. Supports Hybrid Deployments: Enable multi-platform projects by:

    • Detecting multiple platforms simultaneously
    • Composing hybrid patterns
    • Managing platform-specific overrides

Pattern Structure​

Each validated pattern includes:

{
  // Identification
  id, name, version, platformType, description,

  // Bill of Materials
  billOfMaterials: {
    dependencies: [/* tools, runtimes, SDKs */],
    configurations: [/* required config files */],
    secrets: [/* credentials, API keys */],
    infrastructure: [/* databases, queues, etc. */]
  },

  // Deployment Lifecycle
  deploymentPhases: [/* ordered deployment steps */],

  // Validation
  validationChecks: [/* post-deployment validation */],
  healthChecks: [/* ongoing monitoring */],

  // Environment Overrides
  environmentOverrides: [/* dev, staging, prod differences */],

  // Metadata
  metadata: { source, lastUpdated, maintainer, tags, references }
}

Implementation​

Phase 1: Pattern Definitions (COMPLETED)​

  • ✅ Created validated-pattern-definitions.ts with all 7 patterns
  • ✅ Defined comprehensive pattern structure
  • ✅ Included bill of materials, deployment phases, validation checks
  • ✅ Added environment overrides for each pattern

Phase 2: Platform Detection (COMPLETED)​

  • ✅ Created platform-detector.ts
  • ✅ Implemented file-based detection
  • ✅ Added content pattern matching
  • ✅ Implemented confidence scoring
  • ✅ Added recommendation generation

Phase 3: Pattern Application Framework (IN PROGRESS)​

  • Pattern loading and selection
  • Prerequisite validation
  • Configuration file generation
  • Deployment phase execution
  • Validation check running
  • Health monitoring setup

Phase 4: Bootstrap Integration (PLANNED)​

  • Integrate with bootstrap-validation-loop-tool.ts
  • Use patterns for script generation
  • Apply pattern-specific validation
  • Store learnings to pattern memory

Phase 5: Memory Persistence (PLANNED)​

  • Extend Memory Entity Manager
  • Store pattern applications
  • Track deployment history
  • Enable pattern querying

Consequences​

Positive​

  1. Consistency: Same deployment approach for each platform type, every time

  2. Reproducibility: Versioned patterns enable exact recreation of deployments

  3. Best Practices: Automatically follows industry standards for each platform

  4. Multi-Platform Support: Single system handles 7+ platforms with room for expansion

  5. Self-Learning: Patterns evolve based on real-world deployment experience

  6. Reduced Errors: Standardized approaches reduce human error

  7. Faster Onboarding: New team members can use patterns without deep platform knowledge

  8. Documentation: Patterns serve as living documentation of deployment processes

Negative​

  1. Initial Overhead: Creating comprehensive patterns takes time upfront

  2. Maintenance Burden: Patterns must be kept up-to-date with platform changes

  3. Flexibility Trade-off: Standardization may limit customization for edge cases

  4. Learning Curve: Team needs to understand pattern system

  5. Pattern Evolution: Balancing pattern stability vs. incorporating learnings

Risks​

  1. Pattern Drift: Patterns may diverge from current best practices if not maintained

    • Mitigation: Regular review cycle, automated checks against upstream sources

  2. Over-Standardization: Patterns may not fit all project needs

    • Mitigation: Support custom patterns and pattern overrides

  3. Version Lock-in: Patterns tied to specific platform versions

    • Mitigation: Version patterns, support multiple pattern versions

  4. False Detections: Platform detection may misidentify project types

    • Mitigation: Allow manual pattern selection, show confidence scores

Alternatives Considered​

1. Continue Ad-Hoc Approach​

Rejected: Leads to continued inconsistency and tribal knowledge

2. Single Universal Pattern​

Rejected: Platforms are too different for one-size-fits-all

3. External Tool Integration (Ansible, Terraform)​

Rejected: Adds external dependencies, doesn't integrate with existing memory system

4. Platform-Specific Scripts Only​

Rejected: No learning or evolution, difficult to maintain

References​

Research Sources​

Implementation Files​

  • src/utils/validated-pattern-definitions.ts: Pattern definitions
  • src/utils/platform-detector.ts: Platform detection
  • docs/how-to-guides/validated-patterns-implementation.md: Implementation guide

Review and Approval​

Proposed By: AI Architecture Assistant Review Date: 2025-01-16 Reviewers: [To be assigned] Approval Status: AWAITING REVIEW

Future Enhancements​

  1. Additional Patterns: Add patterns for Go, Rust, Java, .NET
  2. Pattern Composition: Allow combining multiple patterns for complex projects
  3. Pattern Templates: Enable creating project-specific pattern templates
  4. CI/CD Integration: Integrate patterns into CI/CD pipelines
  5. Pattern Marketplace: Share and download community patterns
  6. Pattern Validation: Automated testing of patterns against real projects
  7. Pattern Analytics: Track pattern usage and success rates
  8. AI-Powered Pattern Evolution: Use AI to suggest pattern improvements

This ADR documents a foundational architectural decision that will significantly improve deployment consistency and reliability across the project.