ADR-002: AI Integration and Advanced Prompting Strategy
Statusโ
Accepted
Contextโ
The MCP ADR Analysis Server integrates advanced AI capabilities for architectural analysis, including Knowledge Generation, Reflexion learning, and Automatic Prompt Engineering (APE). The system needs to provide high-quality analysis with confidence scoring, evidence-based recommendations, and systematic verification processes. The choice of AI integration approach affects analysis quality, response time, system complexity, and reliability.
Decisionโ
We will implement a hybrid AI integration approach using advanced prompting techniques (Knowledge Generation + Reflexion + APE) with external AI services, combined with local caching and methodological pragmatism framework for systematic verification and confidence scoring.
Key components:
- Knowledge Generation: Domain-specific architectural knowledge enhancement
- Reflexion Learning: Learning from past analysis outcomes and experiences
- Automatic Prompt Engineering: Optimized prompt generation for better results
- Confidence Scoring: Systematic confidence assessment for all recommendations
- Evidence-Based Analysis: All recommendations backed by concrete evidence
- Methodological Pragmatism: Explicit fallibilism and systematic verification
Consequencesโ
Positive:
- Enhanced analysis quality with confidence scoring and evidence backing
- Systematic verification processes reduce false positives
- Learning from past experiences improves future analysis
- Methodological pragmatism provides structured approach to uncertainty
- Advanced prompting techniques improve AI response quality
- Local caching reduces latency and external service dependency
Negative:
- Increased complexity in prompt management and AI workflow orchestration
- Dependency on external AI services for advanced analysis
- Potential latency in analysis due to multi-step AI processing
- Need for sophisticated error handling and fallback mechanisms
- Higher computational costs due to advanced prompting techniques
- Complexity in managing confidence scoring and evidence validation