Skip to main content

👥 Tutorial: Team Collaboration Workflows

Learn how to implement collaborative architectural decision-making processes using MCP ADR Analysis Server.

Time: 60 minutes
Level: Advanced
Prerequisites: Completed First Steps and Existing Projects tutorials

🎯 What You'll Learn​

By the end of this tutorial, you'll be able to:

  • Set up multi-developer ADR workflows
  • Implement collaborative decision review processes
  • Establish team knowledge sharing practices
  • Create standardized architectural documentation
  • Manage distributed architectural decisions

🛠️ Prerequisites Check​

Before starting, ensure you have:

# 1. MCP server installed for all team members
mcp-adr-analysis-server --test

# 2. Shared project repository
git clone https://github.com/your-org/team-project.git
cd team-project

# 3. Team coordination tools ready
# - Slack/Teams for notifications
# - GitHub/GitLab for code reviews
# - Shared documentation platform

👥 Step 1: Team Setup and Standards​

1.1 Establish Team ADR Standards​

Create shared ADR configuration for consistency:

# Create team ADR configuration
mkdir -p .adr-config
cat > .adr-config/team-standards.json << 'EOF'
{
  "adrDirectory": "./architecture/decisions",
  "template": "madr",
  "reviewProcess": {
    "requiredReviewers": 2,
    "architectureTeamReview": true,
    "securityReview": true
  },
  "namingConvention": "YYYYMMDD-decision-title",
  "categories": [
    "architecture",
    "security",
    "performance",
    "integration",
    "infrastructure"
  ],
  "stakeholders": {
    "architecture": ["@arch-team"],
    "security": ["@security-team"],
    "performance": ["@performance-team"]
  }
}
EOF

1.2 Create Team ADR Template​

{
  "tool": "generate_adr_template",
  "parameters": {
    "template": "team-collaborative",
    "includeStakeholders": true,
    "includeReviewProcess": true,
    "outputPath": "./architecture/adr-template.md"
  }
}

1.3 Initialize Shared ADR Directory​

# Create standardized directory structure
mkdir -p ./architecture/decisions
mkdir -p ./architecture/reviews
mkdir -p ./architecture/proposals

# Create ADR index
cat > ./architecture/decision../../README.md << 'EOF'
# Architectural Decision Records

## Team Process

1. **Proposal Phase**: Create ADR draft in `proposals/` directory
2. **Review Phase**: Team review and discussion
3. **Decision Phase**: Move to `decisions/` with final status
4. **Implementation**: Track progress and outcomes

## Current Decisions

| ID | Title | Status | Date | Stakeholders |
|----|-------|--------|------|--------------|
| 001 | [Database Architecture](001-database-architecture.md) | Accepted | 2024-01-15 | @backend-team |
| 002 | [API Gateway Strategy](002-api-gateway-strategy.md) | Proposed | 2024-01-20 | @api-team |

## Review Schedule

- **Weekly ADR Review**: Fridays 2:00 PM
- **Architecture Sync**: Bi-weekly Mondays 10:00 AM
- **Emergency Reviews**: As needed via Slack #architecture

EOF

🔄 Step 2: Collaborative Decision Process​

2.1 Proposal Creation Workflow​

Team Member A creates a new architectural proposal:

{
  "tool": "suggest_adrs",
  "parameters": {
    "projectPath": ".",
    "analysisScope": "technology",
    "maxSuggestions": 3,
    "includeStakeholders": true,
    "collaborativeMode": true
  }
}

Create proposal from suggestion:

{
  "tool": "generate_adr_from_decision",
  "parameters": {
    "decisionData": {
      "title": "Microservices Communication Strategy",
      "context": "Current monolithic architecture is becoming difficult to scale and maintain. Team needs to decide on communication patterns for planned microservices migration.",
      "options": [
        "Synchronous REST APIs with service discovery",
        "Event-driven architecture with message queues",
        "Hybrid approach with both sync and async patterns"
      ],
      "stakeholders": ["@backend-team", "@devops-team", "@architecture-team"],
      "reviewers": ["alice@company.com", "bob@company.com"],
      "timeline": "Decision needed by 2024-02-01"
    },
    "template": "collaborative",
    "outputPath": "./architecture/proposals/microservices-communication.md",
    "status": "proposed"
  }
}

2.2 Team Review Process​

Team Member B reviews the proposal:

{
  "tool": "analyze_adr_proposal",
  "parameters": {
    "proposalPath": "./architecture/proposals/microservices-communication.md",
    "reviewerContext": {
      "role": "senior-backend-engineer",
      "expertise": ["distributed-systems", "performance"],
      "concerns": ["scalability", "maintainability"]
    },
    "includeAlternatives": true
  }
}

Add review comments:

{
  "tool": "add_adr_review",
  "parameters": {
    "adrPath": "./architecture/proposals/microservices-communication.md",
    "reviewer": "bob@company.com",
    "reviewType": "technical",
    "comments": [
      {
        "section": "consequences",
        "comment": "Consider adding circuit breaker patterns for resilience",
        "suggestion": "Add Hystrix or similar circuit breaker implementation",
        "priority": "high"
      },
      {
        "section": "alternatives",
        "comment": "GraphQL federation might be worth considering",
        "suggestion": "Evaluate Apollo Federation for API composition",
        "priority": "medium"
      }
    ],
    "approval": "approved-with-changes"
  }
}

2.3 Collaborative Decision Refinement​

Team Lead facilitates decision convergence:

{
  "tool": "facilitate_adr_decision",
  "parameters": {
    "proposalPath": "./architecture/proposals/microservices-communication.md",
    "reviewsPath": "./architecture/reviews/",
    "facilitatorRole": "tech-lead",
    "decisionCriteria": {
      "performance": 0.3,
      "maintainability": 0.25,
      "team_expertise": 0.2,
      "implementation_cost": 0.15,
      "risk": 0.1
    },
    "consensusThreshold": 0.8
  }
}

📋 Step 3: Knowledge Sharing Workflows​

3.1 Team Knowledge Extraction​

Extract architectural knowledge from team discussions:

{
  "tool": "extract_team_knowledge",
  "parameters": {
    "sources": [
      "slack-exports/architecture-channel.json",
      "meeting-notes/architecture-sync-*.md",
      "code-reviews/architectural-changes.json"
    ],
    "knowledgeTypes": [
      "architectural-patterns",
      "technology-decisions",
      "lessons-learned",
      "best-practices"
    ],
    "outputFormat": "adr-insights"
  }
}

3.2 Cross-Team ADR Discovery​

Help teams discover relevant ADRs from other projects:

{
  "tool": "discover_related_adrs",
  "parameters": {
    "currentProject": ".",
    "organizationRepos": ["frontend-platform", "backend-services", "infrastructure-tools"],
    "similarityThreshold": 0.7,
    "includeExternal": true
  }
}

3.3 Team Expertise Mapping​

{
  "tool": "map_team_expertise",
  "parameters": {
    "teamMembers": [
      {
        "name": "Alice Johnson",
        "expertise": ["react", "typescript", "frontend-architecture"],
        "experience": "senior"
      },
      {
        "name": "Bob Smith",
        "expertise": ["nodejs", "microservices", "distributed-systems"],
        "experience": "senior"
      },
      {
        "name": "Carol Davis",
        "expertise": ["devops", "kubernetes", "infrastructure"],
        "experience": "mid"
      }
    ],
    "projectRequirements": "microservices migration",
    "generateRecommendations": true
  }
}

🔄 Step 4: Distributed Decision Management​

4.1 Multi-Repository ADR Synchronization​

For organizations with multiple repositories:

{
  "tool": "sync_distributed_adrs",
  "parameters": {
    "repositories": [
      {
        "name": "frontend-app",
        "path": "../frontend-app",
        "adrDirectory": "./adrs"
      },
      {
        "name": "backend-api",
        "path": "../backend-api",
        "adrDirectory": "architecture/decisions"
      },
      {
        "name": "infrastructure",
        "path": "../infrastructure",
        "adrDirectory": "./architecture"
      }
    ],
    "syncStrategy": "bidirectional",
    "conflictResolution": "manual-review"
  }
}

4.2 Cross-Team Impact Analysis​

{
  "tool": "analyze_cross_team_impact",
  "parameters": {
    "proposedAdr": "./architecture/proposals/microservices-communication.md",
    "affectedTeams": [
      {
        "name": "frontend-team",
        "repositories": ["web-app", "mobile-app"],
        "concerns": ["api-contracts", "performance"]
      },
      {
        "name": "infrastructure-team",
        "repositories": ["k8s-configs", "monitoring"],
        "concerns": ["deployment", "observability"]
      }
    ],
    "generateNotifications": true
  }
}

4.3 Federated ADR Governance​

{
  "tool": "establish_adr_governance",
  "parameters": {
    "governanceModel": "federated",
    "organizationLevel": {
      "standards": ["security", "compliance", "architecture-principles"],
      "approvers": ["@architecture-council"]
    },
    "teamLevel": {
      "autonomy": ["technology-choices", "implementation-details"],
      "approvers": ["@team-leads"]
    },
    "escalationRules": {
      "cross-team-impact": "organization-level",
      "security-implications": "security-team-review",
      "budget-impact": "management-approval"
    }
  }
}

📊 Step 5: Team Metrics and Insights​

5.1 Team Collaboration Metrics​

{
  "tool": "generate_team_metrics",
  "parameters": {
    "metricsType": "collaboration",
    "timeframe": "last_quarter",
    "includeMetrics": [
      "adr-participation-rate",
      "review-turnaround-time",
      "decision-implementation-rate",
      "knowledge-sharing-frequency"
    ],
    "teamBreakdown": true
  }
}

5.2 Decision Quality Assessment​

{
  "tool": "assess_decision_quality",
  "parameters": {
    "adrDirectory": "./architecture/decisions",
    "qualityMetrics": [
      "stakeholder-involvement",
      "alternative-consideration",
      "consequence-analysis",
      "implementation-success"
    ],
    "benchmarkAgainst": "industry-standards"
  }
}

5.3 Knowledge Gap Analysis​

{
  "tool": "analyze_knowledge_gaps",
  "parameters": {
    "teamExpertise": "team-expertise-map.json",
    "projectRequirements": ".",
    "identifyTrainingNeeds": true,
    "suggestMentoring": true
  }
}

🔧 Step 6: Automation and Integration​

6.1 Automated ADR Workflows​

Create GitHub Actions for ADR automation:

# .github/workflows/adr-collaboration.yml
name: ADR Collaboration Workflow

on:
  pull_request:
    paths: ['./architecture/**']

jobs:
  adr-review:
    runs-on: ubuntu-latest
    steps:
      - uses: actions/checkout@v3

      - name: Install MCP Server
        run: npm install -g mcp-adr-analysis-server

      - name: Validate ADR Format
        run: |
          # Validate ADR follows team standards

      - name: Notify Stakeholders
        run: |
          # Auto-notify relevant team members

      - name: Generate Review Checklist
        run: |
          # Create PR checklist based on ADR content

6.2 Slack Integration​

{
  "tool": "setup_slack_integration",
  "parameters": {
    "webhookUrl": "${{ secrets.SLACK_WEBHOOK }}",
    "channels": {
      "architecture": "#architecture-decisions",
      "security": "#security-reviews",
      "general": "#engineering-updates"
    },
    "notifications": [
      "new-adr-proposal",
      "adr-review-needed",
      "adr-decision-made",
      "implementation-complete"
    ],
    "mentionRules": {
      "security-adrs": "@security-team",
      "infrastructure-adrs": "@devops-team"
    }
  }
}

6.3 Documentation Synchronization​

{
  "tool": "sync_team_documentation",
  "parameters": {
    "sources": [
      "./architecture/decisions/",
      "./architecture/reviews/",
      "team-wiki/architecture/"
    ],
    "destinations": ["confluence-space", "notion-database", "team-handbook"],
    "syncFrequency": "daily",
    "formatTransformation": true
  }
}

🎯 Step 7: Advanced Collaboration Patterns​

7.1 Asynchronous Decision Making​

For distributed teams across time zones:

{
  "tool": "setup_async_decision_process",
  "parameters": {
    "timeZones": ["PST", "EST", "CET", "IST"],
    "reviewWindows": {
      "initial-review": "48-hours",
      "final-decision": "72-hours",
      "emergency-decision": "24-hours"
    },
    "consensusMechanisms": ["written-approval", "async-voting", "delegated-authority"]
  }
}

7.2 Architectural Decision Workshops​

{
  "tool": "facilitate_adr_workshop",
  "parameters": {
    "workshopType": "architecture-decision-session",
    "duration": "2-hours",
    "participants": ["product-owner", "tech-lead", "senior-engineers", "architect"],
    "agenda": [
      "problem-definition",
      "option-generation",
      "evaluation-criteria",
      "decision-making",
      "action-planning"
    ],
    "outputFormat": "collaborative-adr"
  }
}

7.3 Mentorship and Knowledge Transfer​

{
  "tool": "create_mentorship_program",
  "parameters": {
    "pairings": [
      {
        "mentor": "senior-architect",
        "mentee": "junior-developer",
        "focus": "architectural-thinking"
      }
    ],
    "activities": ["adr-review-sessions", "architecture-walkthroughs", "decision-shadowing"],
    "progressTracking": true
  }
}

📈 Step 8: Scaling Team Collaboration​

8.1 Multi-Team Coordination​

{
  "tool": "coordinate_multi_team_decisions",
  "parameters": {
    "teams": ["platform-team", "product-teams", "infrastructure-team"],
    "coordinationModel": "hub-and-spoke",
    "communicationChannels": ["architecture-council", "tech-leads-sync", "cross-team-reviews"],
    "escalationPaths": {
      "technical-conflicts": "architecture-council",
      "resource-conflicts": "engineering-management"
    }
  }
}

8.2 Organizational Learning​

{
  "tool": "capture_organizational_learning",
  "parameters": {
    "learningTypes": [
      "successful-patterns",
      "failed-experiments",
      "external-insights",
      "retrospective-findings"
    ],
    "captureFrequency": "quarterly",
    "sharingMechanisms": ["tech-talks", "internal-blog-posts", "architecture-playbooks"]
  }
}

🎓 Key Takeaways​

Collaboration Principles Learned​

  1. Structured Decision Process: Clear stages from proposal to implementation
  2. Stakeholder Involvement: Right people involved at right time
  3. Knowledge Sharing: Continuous learning and expertise distribution
  4. Distributed Coordination: Managing decisions across teams and repositories
  5. Automated Workflows: Reducing manual overhead in collaboration

Team Dynamics​

  • Psychological Safety: Environment where team members feel safe to propose and challenge decisions
  • Diverse Perspectives: Including different roles and expertise levels
  • Clear Accountability: Who makes decisions and who implements them
  • Continuous Improvement: Regular retrospectives on decision-making process

Tools and Processes​

  • Standardized ADR templates and processes
  • Automated notifications and reviews
  • Cross-team impact analysis
  • Knowledge gap identification
  • Collaboration metrics tracking

🚀 Next Steps​

Immediate Implementation​

  1. Establish Team Standards: Create shared ADR configuration
  2. Set Up Workflows: Implement proposal and review processes
  3. Create Automation: Set up GitHub Actions and Slack integration
  4. Train Team Members: Ensure everyone understands the process

Advanced Practices​

Continuous Improvement​

  • Regular retrospectives on collaboration effectiveness
  • Metrics-driven process optimization
  • External benchmarking against industry practices
  • Tool and process evolution based on team feedback

📚 Resources​

🎉 Congratulations! You've completed the Team Collaboration Workflows tutorial. You now have the skills to implement effective collaborative architectural decision-making processes that scale with your team and organization.

Questions or want to share your team's success story? → File an Issue or contribute to our Community Discussions